نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی

نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی

تدوین مدل انسان‌انگاری برند: مطالعه‌ای نظری با تمرکز بر نگرش مصرف‌کننده

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از پایان نامه

نویسندگان
1 گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد علوم و تحقیقات، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی، تهران، ایران
2 گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، واحد امارات ،دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی،دبی، امارات متحده عربی
چکیده
با وجود گسترش مطالعات انسان‌انگاری برند، ابعاد شناختی، رفتاری، نمادین و فناورانه این مفهوم غالباً به‌صورت پراکنده بررسی شده‌اند و تاکنون چارچوبی یکپارچه و زمینه‌مند برای صنایع غذایی ایران، با تمرکز بر نسل زد، کمتر ارائه‌شده است. پژوهش حاضر با هدف تدوین مدل انسان‌انگاری برند در این بستر انجام‌شده است. این پژوهش ازنظر هدف، توسعه‌ای و ازنظر ماهیت، کیفی است و با رویکرد اکتشافی و طرح چندروشی و متوالی انجام‌شده است. در مرحلۀ نخست، مطالعات مرتبط با استفاده از روش فراترکیب و بر اساس الگوی هفت‌مرحله‌ای ساندلوفسکی و باروسو بررسی شدند. در مرحلۀ دوم، مصاحبه‌های نیمه‌ساختاریافته با 14 خبره منتخب، به روش نمونه‌گیری هدفمند، انجام شد و داده‌های حاصل از مصاحبه‌ها بر اساس الگوی شش‌مرحله‌ای براون و کلارک تحلیل شدند. در نهایت، یافته‌های حاصل از دو مرحله به‌صورت تطبیقی بررسی و تلفیق شدند. در مرحلۀ فراترکیب، 40 شاخص اولیه شناسایی شد. تلفیق این شاخص‌ها با یافته‌های مصاحبه‌ها به شناسایی 54 شاخص نهایی انجامید که در قالب 10 مضمون سازمان‌دهنده و سه مضمون فراگیر «شناخت و ادراک برند»، «تعامل و رفتار برند» و «تصویر و نماد برند» دسته‌بندی شدند. یافته‌ها نشان دادند که انسان‌انگاری برند فراتر از برخورداری از نشانه‌های ظاهری انسانی است و از طریق پیوند میان ادراک ویژگی‌ها و نیت‌های انسانی برند، رفتار و تعامل انسان‌گونه و بازنمایی منسجم هویت انسانی آن شکل می‌گیرد. مدل حاصل، انسان‌انگاری برند را در قالب چارچوبی شناختی–رفتاری–هویتی تبیین می‌کند که با تلفیق ادبیات موجود و دیدگاه خبرگان، الگویی زمینه‌مند برای مطالعۀ صنایع غذایی ایران با تمرکز بر نسل زد ارائه می‌دهد. این مدل همچنین می‌تواند مبنایی برای توسعۀ نظری، آزمون تجربی در میان مصرف‌کنندگان نسل زد و طراحی راهبردهای برندسازی در صنایع غذایی باشد.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Developing a Model of Brand Anthropomorphism: A Theoretical Study Focusing on Consumer Attitudes

نویسندگان English

fatemeh Mohammadhani 1
Mohammad Ali Abdolvand 1
Kambiz Heidarzadeh Henzai 1
Seyed Alireza Mousavi 2
1 Department of Business Management, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Business Management, UAE Branch (Dubai), Islamic Azad University, United Arab Emirates
چکیده English

Introduction and Purpose: In increasingly competitive markets, sustainable brand advantage depends not only on price, quality, and distribution, but also on establishing meaningful emotional, psychological, and social relationships with consumers. Brand anthropomorphism explains how consumers perceive brands as human-like entities possessing personality traits, intentions, emotions, values, and interaction capabilities. Although research in this field has expanded, its cognitive, emotional, behavioral, symbolic, and technological dimensions have often been examined separately. The development of artificial intelligence, chatbots, avatars, and interactive technologies has extended anthropomorphism beyond visual human cues to include responsiveness, personalization, learning, and human-like interaction. Generation Z is particularly relevant in this regard because of its digital immersion and expectations of responsiveness, personalization, transparency, social responsibility, and value alignment. Accordingly, this study aimed to develop a comprehensive framework of brand anthropomorphism in the Iranian food industry, focusing on Generation Z, and to identify and organize its dimensions, components, and indicators.
Methodology: This study employed a developmental, qualitative, exploratory, sequential multi-method design based on an interpretivist perspective. In the first stage, a meta-synthesis was conducted using the seven-step model proposed by Sandelowski and Barroso. A systematic search was performed in Emerald, Scopus, Web of Science, Noormags, Magiran, and SID using English and Persian keywords related to brand anthropomorphism and consumers. Studies published between 2010 and 2025 were considered. The inclusion criteria comprised relevance to the research topic, peer-reviewed publication, extractable findings, and the availability of a theoretical or conceptual framework. PRISMA principles guided the reporting process, and CASP was used for quality assessment. Of the 120 initially identified records, 13 were removed before abstract screening, and 11 were excluded after abstract review. Following full-text review and quality assessment, 37 studies were selected. Repeated comparisons of semantic units resulted in 40 initial indicators, which informed the development of the interview guide. In the second stage, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 14 experts selected through purposive sampling, including 12 senior food-industry managers and two university faculty members. The interviews lasted an average of 72 minutes and were recorded and transcribed with the participants' informed consent. The data were analyzed using Braun and Clarke's six-step thematic analysis. Open coding allowed both literature-based and context-specific concepts to emerge. Concepts identified by at least three experts were retained and organized according to their conceptual similarities. Reliability was assessed through repeated interviews and independent coding by two evaluators. The observed agreement rates across three interviews were 92%, 91%, and 95%, indicating very good inter-coder agreement.
Findings: The meta-synthesis identified 40 initial indicators. Their integration with the interview findings resulted in 54 final indicators, organized into 10 organizing themes and three overarching themes: Brand Cognition and Perception, Brand Interaction and Behavior, and Brand Image and Symbolism. Brand Cognition and Perception indicates that human-like perceptions emerge when consumers attribute personality, intentions, emotions, logical reasoning, moral consciousness, and consistency to a brand. Responsibility, empathy, transparency, innovation, cultural awareness, and personality consistency contribute to perceiving a brand as trustworthy, understandable, socially aware, and human-like. Brand Interaction and Behavior demonstrates that anthropomorphism is strengthened when brands behave like human relationship partners. Responsiveness, personalized interaction, customer participation, emotional support, problem-solving, learning from feedback, sincere apologies, responsible complaint management, and social engagement contribute to this perception. Artificial intelligence, gamification, and multisensory experiences can reinforce anthropomorphism when they create a sense of presence and reciprocity rather than merely technological appeal. Brand Image and Symbolism emphasizes authenticity, cultural compatibility, human personality cues, avatars, emotional expressions, and coherent visual and symbolic representations. Human-like representations become more meaningful when they are consistent with actual brand behavior and aligned with consumers' cultural and social identities. Thus, anthropomorphism involves not simply making a brand look human, but also constructing an authentic, recognizable, and coherent human-like identity. A comparison of the two stages showed that 36 concepts were common to both stages, 14 emerged exclusively from expert interviews, and four indicators identified through the meta-synthesis did not emerge during the interviews. This finding confirms that the interview stage not only validated the previous literature but also revealed context-specific and emerging dimensions.
Discussion and Conclusion: The findings provide an integrated cognitive–behavioral–identity framework for understanding brand anthropomorphism in the Iranian food industry, with a particular focus on Generation Z. The framework extends approaches that emphasize human appearance or personality by demonstrating that anthropomorphism emerges through cognition and attribution, brand behavior and interaction, and identity and representation. Dual Processing Theory helps explain the simultaneous cognitive and emotional evaluation of human-like brands; Social Exchange Theory clarifies reciprocal and responsive brand–consumer interactions; Flow Theory highlights the role of engaging experiences; Social Identity Theory explains the importance of shared values and consumer identification; and brand personification perspectives explain how coherent human characteristics transform a brand into a recognizable personality. From a managerial perspective, food-brand managers should not reduce anthropomorphism to friendly language, human faces, or advertising characters. Instead, they should establish consistency among what the brand communicates, does, and represents. Transparency regarding products and ingredients, social and environmental responsibility, responsive complaint management, meaningful personalization, the appropriate use of artificial intelligence, culturally relevant visual identity, and authentic digital interaction can strengthen perceptions of a credible human-like brand. Overall, brand anthropomorphism does not result from a single human cue, but rather from consistency among cognition, behavior, interaction, identity, and symbolic representation. The proposed framework provides a context-specific basis for understanding and managing anthropomorphism in Iran's food industry and establishes a foundation for empirical testing among Generation Z consumers. Future research should quantitatively validate the model and examine its applicability across generations, industries, and cultural contexts, as well as its potentially negative consequences, such as perceptions of artificiality and distrust.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Brand Anthropomorphism
Generation Z
Food Industry
Brand Interaction and Behavior
Brand Image and Symbolism.
حاجی بابانی، حسین (۱۴۰۳) آنتروپومورفیسم در هوش مصنوعی و تأثیر آن بر قصد خرید. مدیریت بازاریابی هوشمند، ۱۴۰۳
    دوره ۵، شماره ۴، پیاییhttps://civilica.com/doc/2098234/.
خدامی، سهیلا , اصانلو، بهاره و صفری کلاچایی، فاطمه. (1404). اثرگذاری انسان‌انگاری برند بر قصد خرید مشتری. فصلنامه   
    علمی پژوهشی مدیریت برند , 12 (3), 63-118.  https://doi.org/10.22051/bmr.2023.40336.2340⁠
Aaker, J. L. (1997). Dimensions of brand personality. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(3), 347–356. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224379703400304⁠
Alalwan, A. A., Algharabat, R., Abu El Samen, A., Albanna, H., & Al-Okaily, M. (2025). Examining the impact of anthropomorphism and AI-chatbots service quality on online customer flow experience–exploring the moderating role of telepresence. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 42(4), 448–471. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-06-2024-6929⁠
Ali, F., Dogan, S., Amin, M., Hussain, K., & Ryu, K. (2021). Brand anthropomorphism, love and defense: Does attitude towards social distancing matter? The Service Industries Journal, 41(1–2), 58–83. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2020.1867542
Brandão, A., & Popoli, P. (2023). “I will always hate you”! An investigation of the impact of anthropomorphism in online anti-brand communities. European Business Review, 35(3), 444–466. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-09-2022-0194⁠
Brown, M., & Anderson, K. (2021). Building brand trust: The role of transparency, authenticity, and ethical practices in consumer engagement. Research Studies of Business, 5(2), 45–60. https://ipindexing.com/media/articlefile/22713271.pdf
Brüns, J. D., & Meißner, M. (2023). Show me that you are advertising: Visual salience of products attenuates detrimental effects of persuasion knowledge activation in influencer advertising. Computers in Human Behavior, 148, 107891. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2023.107891
Ceccotti, F., Vernuccio, M., & Torti, F. (2024). Brand anthropomorphization on social media: The role of human tone of voice. In F. J. Martínez-López, L. F. Martinez, & P. Brüggemann (Eds.), Advances in digital marketing and eCommerce: DMEC 2024 (pp. 75–86). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-62135-2_8⁠
Choi, S., Mattila, A. S., & Bolton, L. E. (2021). To err is human(-oid): How do consumers react to robot service failure and recovery? Journal of Service Research, 24(3), 354–371. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094670520978798⁠
Cho, Y. Y. (2025). Virtual influencers as brand endorsers: Developing and validating a multidimensional evaluation scale. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 90. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020090⁠
Corciulo, S., & Bochicchio, M. A. (2024). Sinestesia as a model for HCI: A systematic review. arXiv. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.09303⁠
Cui, Y., & Yang, J. (2025). Beyond humor: Unpacking the power of branded entertainment in crisis communication [Master’s thesis, Lund University]. Lund University Publications. https://lup.lub.lu.se/student-papers/record/9203919
Deligoz, K., & Ünal, S. (2021). The effect of anthropomorphic mascot on the purchasing intention of consumers: An experimental study. Sosyoekonomi, 29(50), 229–254. https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2021.04.11⁠
Ding, A., Lee, R. M., Legendre, T. S., & Madera, J. M. (2022). Anthropomorphism in hospitality and tourism: A systematic review and agenda for future research. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 52, 404–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2022.07.018⁠
Duffy, B. R. (2003). Anthropomorphism and the social robot. Robotics and Autonomous Systems, 42(3–4), 177–190. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0921-8890(02)00374-3⁠
Dwidienawati, D., Pradipto, Y., Indrawati, L., & Gandasari, D. (2025). Internal and external factors influencing Gen Z wellbeing. BMC Public Health, 25, 1584. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-025-22124-5⁠
Dwivedi, R. K., & Kumar, Y. (2025). Chatbots and customer service: Exploring the impact of AI on customer satisfaction and brand loyalty. In 2025 International Conference on Frontier Technologies and Solutions (ICFTS) (pp. 1–6). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICFTS62006.2025.11031845
⁠Epley, N., Waytz, A., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2007). On seeing human: A three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychological Review, 114(4), 864–886. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.114.4.864
Flecha Ortiz, J. A., Santos Corrada, M. D. L. M., Lopez, E., Dones, V., & Feliberty Lugo, V. (2023). Don’t make ads, make TikTok’s: Media and brand engagement through Gen Z’s use of TikTok and its significance in purchase intent. Journal of Brand Management, 30(6), 535–549. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00330-z
Foong, E., Vincent, N., Hecht, B., & Gerber, E. M. (2018). Women (still) ask for less: Gender differences in hourly rate in an online labor marketplace. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 2(CSCW), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1145/3274322
García-Sánchez, I. M., Hussain, N., Akbar Khan, S., & Martínez-Ferrero, J. (2023). Will consumers give us another chance to bounce back? Effects of precrisis commitments to social and product responsibility on brand resilience. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 32(6), 927–941. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-03-2022-3899⁠
Gartner. (2020). How to set up and run a conversational AI initiative for customer service during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gartner. https://www.gartner.com/doc/reprints?ct=201021&id=1-24F35Y3V&st=sb
Gilbert, H., Shin, H., Eastman, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Is it love or just like? Generation Z’s brand relationship with luxury. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(3), 310–325. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2020-3049
Golossenko, A., Pillai, K. G., & Aroean, L. (2020). Seeing brands as humans: Development and validation of a brand anthropomorphism scale. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 37(4), 737–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijresmar.2020.02.007⁠
Gomes, S., Lopes, J. M., & Nogueira, E. (2025). Anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence: A game-changer for brand marketing. Future Business Journal, 11, Article 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-025-00423-y
Guerra-Tamez, C. R., Kraul Flores, K., Serna-Mendiburu, G. M., Chavelas Robles, D., & Ibarra Cortés, J. (2024). Decoding Gen Z: AI’s influence on brand trust and purchasing behavior. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence, 7, Article 1323512. https://doi.org/10.3389/frai.2024.1323512
Haji Babaei, H. (2024). Anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence and its impact on purchase intention. Smart Marketing Management, 5(4). https://civilica.com/doc/2098234/ [In Persian]
Han, B., Wang, L., & Li, X. R. (2020). To collaborate or serve? Effects of anthropomorphized brand roles and implicit theories on consumer responses. Cornell Hospitality Quarterly, 61(1), 53–67. https://doi.org/10.1177/1938965519874879
Han, C. M., Nam, H., & Swanepoel, D. (2023). Perceived brand localness of foreign brands and its impacts on brand trust and purchase intentions in developing countries in Asia: A social identity theory perspective. International Marketing Review, 40(6), 1297–1324. https://doi.org/10.1108/IMR-05-2022-0130
Hede, A. M., & Watne, T. (2013). Leveraging the human side of the brand using a sense of place: Case studies of craft breweries. Journal of Marketing Management, 29(1–2), 207–224. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257X.2012.762422⁠
Heinonen, I. (2025). The role of anthropomorphism in branding: Effects on consumer trust and purchase intention [Master’s thesis, LUT University]. LUTPub. https://urn.fi/URN:NBN:fi-fe2025061871145
Hussain, K. (2025). Humanizing generative AI brands: How brand anthropomorphism converts customers into brand heroes. Computers in Human Behavior Reports, 19, Article 100707. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chbr.2025.100707⁠
Ilyas, A., Rahman, A. V., & Hartati, B. (2025). Gamification in marketing: Leveraging interactive experiences for higher consumer engagement. International Journal of Economics and Management Research, 4(1), 733–740. https://doi.org/10.55606/ijemr.v4i1.489⁠
Jin, X., & Qian, M. (2021). A review of brand anthropomorphism marketing research. BCP Business & Management, 14, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v14i.69
Jham, V., Malhotra, G., & Sehgal, N. (2025). Green AI partnerships: Investigating the interplay of anthropomorphism and consumer-brand relationships. Services Marketing Quarterly, 46(1–2), 57–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/15332969.2024.2448071
Kanste, O., Ylisirniö, M., Hammarén, M., & Kuha, S. (2025). The perceptions of Generation Z professionals and students concerning health-care work: A scoping review. Nurse Education Today, 150, 106678. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nedt.2025.106678
Karimova, G. Z. (2026). Not in our image: Rethinking anthropomorphism in expert chatbot design. AI & SOCIETY, 41, 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00146-025-02438-z
Kervyn, N., Fiske, S. T., & Malone, C. (2022). Social perception of brands: Warmth and competence define images of both brands and social groups. Consumer Psychology Review, 5(1), 51–68. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1074
Khan, F. M., Anas, M., & Uddin, S. M. F. (2024). Anthropomorphism and consumer behaviour: A SPAR-4-SLR protocol compliant hybrid review. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 48(1), e12985. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijcs.12985⁠
Khodami, S., Asanloo, B., & Safari Kalachaei, F. (2023). The effect of brand anthropomorphism dimensions on customer purchase intention. Brand Management Research Journal. https://doi.org/10.22051/bmr.2023.40336.2340⁠ [In Persian]
Kim, J., & Bae, J. (2025). The influences of aura and anthropomorphism of virtual humans on perceived interactivity and purchase intention. Journal of Global Scholars of Marketing Science, 35(2), 162–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/21639159.2025.2458860⁠
Kim, L. H., Domova, V., Yao, Y., Huang, C.-M., Follmer, S., & Paredes, P. E. (2022). Robotic presence: The effects of anthropomorphism and robot state on task performance and emotion. IEEE Robotics and Automation Letters, 7(3), 7399–7406. https://doi.org/10.1109/LRA.2022.3181726⁠
Kniazeva, M., & Belk, R. W. (2010). If this brand were a person, or anthropomorphism of brands through packaging stories. Journal of Global Academy of Marketing Science, 20(3), 231–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/12297119.2010.9707349⁠
Krsmanović, S. (2026). Generation Z and digital marketing—The new rules of engagement. BizInfo Blace. https://doi.org/10.71159/bizinfo260021K⁠
Kumar, H. (2022). Augmented reality in online retailing: A systematic review and research agenda. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(4), 537–559. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-06-2021-0287⁠
Laksmidewi, D., & Soelasih, Y. (2019). Anthropomorphic green advertising: How to enhance consumers’ environmental concern. DLSU Business & Economics Review, 29(1), 72–84. https://doi.org/10.59588/2243-786X.1536⁠
Lee, S., & Oh, H. (2021). Anthropomorphism and its implications for advertising hotel brands. Journal of Business Research, 129, 455–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.09.053⁠
Li, F., Su, Q., Guan, J., & Zhang, G. (2023). Communicate like humans? Anthropomorphism and hotel consumers’ willingness to pay a premium price. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 56, 482–492. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhtm.2023.08.008⁠
Lourenco, C. E., Correa Ferreira, J., & Martins dos Santos, V. (2024). Humanizing brands in social media: The impact of anthropomorphism on brand identification, engagement, and advocacy. Journal of Marketing Communications. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/13527266.2024.2439841
Ma, J., Tu, H., Zhou, X., & Niu, W. (2023). Can brand anthropomorphism trigger emotional brand attachment? The Service Industries Journal, 43(7–8), 555–578. https://doi.org/10.1080/02642069.2021.2012163
Ma, N., Khynevych, R., Hao, Y., & Wang, Y. (2025). Effect of anthropomorphism and perceived intelligence in chatbot avatars of visual design on user experience: Accounting for perceived empathy and trust. Frontiers in Computer Science, 7, 1531976. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomp.2025.1531976⁠
Maheshwari, V., Larner, E., Islam, M., Burchell, H., & Marchowska-Raza, M. (2025). Consumers, identity, and brand personality. In A. Gbadamosi (Ed.), Brands, branding, and consumerism: Personal and social influences on consumption (pp. 115–147). Palgrave Macmillan. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-80859-3_3⁠
Malhotra, G., & Dandotiya, G. (2023). Unpacking the influence of anthropomorphism and stereotypes on consumer attitude towards luxury brand. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 51(12), 1719–1736. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-04-2023-0273⁠
Marrone, T., Cantone, G. F., Caputo, F., Cantone, L., & Aria, M. (2025). Unpacking dimensions of brand humanization in the Metaverse Era. Technology in Society, 83, 103037. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2025.103037⁠
Masnita, Y., Reskasugih, D., & Rasyawal, M. (2020). Anthropomorphism brand uniqueness: Products marketed offline versus online. International Journal of Scientific and Technology Research, 9(3), 1690–1694. https://www.ijstr.org/final-print/mar2020/Anthropomorphism-Brand-Uniqueness-Products-Marketed-Offline-Versus-Online.pdf
Mathews, J. (2015). Brand personality: Finding compatibility between human personality and brand characteristics. The IUP Journal of Brand Management, 12(2), 21–38. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2687019
Meyer, C., Albert, B. H., Rose, G. M., & Orth, U. R. (2024). Relationship qualities of brand heritage: Warmth, competence and the moderating roles of anthropomorphic factors. European Journal of Marketing, 58(5), 1177–1206. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJM-06-2021-0417⁠
Mishra, R., & Mehta, R. (2023). The effects of food anthropomorphism on consumer behavior: A systematic literature review with integrative framework and future research directions. Appetite, 190, 107035. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2023.107035⁠
Mishra, S., & Bakry, A. (2021). Social identities in consumer-brand relationship: The case of the hijab-wearing Barbie doll in the United States. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 20(6), 1534–1546. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1965⁠
Naletelich, K., Ketron, S., & Gelves, J. A (2023). Curbing texting & driving with advertising co-creation. Journal of Business Research, 156, 113456. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.113456⁠
Napoli, J., Dickinson, S. J., Beverland, M. B., & Farrelly, F. (2016). Measuring consumer-based brand authenticity. Journal of Business Research, 69(12), 5773–5781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2016.04.014⁠
Ngoc Dan, T. N., & Ngoc Truong, P. (2023). Do brand humanism and brand intimacy matter for successfully evaluating customer engagement? Cogent Business & Management, 10(2), 2249897. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2249897⁠
Nguyen Pham, P. N., Ha, Q.-A., & Bui, T. T. (2025). Brand anthropomorphism: A bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Management Research, 21(1), 53–98. https://doi.org/10.7903/cmr.23803
Ochoa, A., Hernández-Báez, I., Lara, C., & González, S. (2025). Technological anthropomorphism affecting Generation Z: Foundation of human-machine interaction for early detection of anxiety and depression. International Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Problems and Informatics, 16(2), 25. https://doi.org/10.61467/2007.1558.2025.v16i2.893
Orth, U. R., Cornwell, T. B., Ohlhoff, J., & Naber, C. (2017). Seeing faces: The role of brand visual processing and social connection in brand liking. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(3), 348–361. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2245⁠
Pacevičiūtė, A., & Razbadauskaitė-Venskė, I. (2023). The role of green marketing in creating a sustainable competitive advantage. Regional Formation and Development Studies, 40(2), 89–98. https://doi.org/10.15181/rfds.v40i2.2533⁠
Park, C. W., & MacInnis, D. J. (2018). Introduction to the special issue: Brand relationships, emotions, and the self. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 3(2), 123–129. https://doi.org/10.1086/696969
Patrizi, M. (2024). Hey Google, I trust you! The consequences of brand anthropomorphism in voice-based artificial intelligence contexts. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.103857⁠
Pramesti, D. A., Haryanto, B., Wahyudi, L., & Sugiarto, C. (2025). Anthropomorphism unveiled: A decade of systematic insights in business and technology trends. F1000Research, 14, 281. https://doi.org/10.12688/f1000research.161945.1⁠
Pramesti, D. A., & Harsono, M. (2023). Antropomorfisme merek dalam kajian filsafat ilmu. Jurnal Manajerial, 10(1), 56–80. https://doi.org/10.30587/jurnalmanajerial.v10i1.4666
Pham, P. N. N., Ha, Q. A., & Bui, T. T. (2025). Brand anthropomorphism: A bibliometric analysis. Contemporary Management Research, 21(1), 53–98.
Prasanna, M., & Priyanka, A. L. (2024). Marketing to Gen Z: Understanding the preferences and behaviors of next generation. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 6(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2024.v06i04.26612
Rao Hill, S., & Troshani, I. (2024). Chatbot anthropomorphism, social presence, uncanniness and brand attitude effects. Journal of Computer Information Systems. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2024.2423187⁠
Rodrigues, C., Brandão, A., Billore, S., et al. (2024). The mediating role of perceived brand authenticity between brand experience and brand love: A cross-cultural perspective. Journal of Brand Management, 31, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-023-00342-9⁠
Ruppelt, H., Almeida, S., & Campos, A. C. (2024). How about meeting Fernando Pessoa? A journey into hotel brand anthropomorphism and personality on social media. Journal of Vacation Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/13567667241238757⁠
Sabri, M. E. M. (2025). Brands in disguise: The role of anthropomorphism in crisis communication [Master’s thesis, University of Vaasa]. Osuva. https://osuva.uwasa.fi/handle/10024/19635
Salvietti, G., Ziliani, C., Teller, C., Ieva, M., & Ranfagni, S. (2022). Omnichannel retailing and post-pandemic recovery: Building a research agenda. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 50(8–9), 1156–1181. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJRDM-10-2021-0485
Sehgal, N., Jham, V., & Malhotra, G. (2023). Does green brand anthropomorphism influence repurchase intention? Understanding the impact of brand warmth, psychological ownership, and self-brand congruity. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 75, 103546. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2023.103546⁠
Sharma, M., & Rahman, Z. (2022). Anthropomorphic brand management: An integrated review and research agenda. Journal of Business Research, 149, 463–475. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.05.039⁠
Shimul, A. S., Sung, B., & Phau, I. (2021). Effects of luxury brand attachment and perceived envy on schadenfreude: Does need for uniqueness moderate? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 38(6), 709–720. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-09-2020-4125
Shin, H., Eastman, J., & Li, Y. (2022). Is it love or just like? Generation Z’s brand relationship with luxury. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 31(3), 394–414. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-08-2020-3049⁠
Singh, D., & Kunja, S. R. (2024). Escaping the reality with humanized brands: Examining the role of anthropomorphized brands in fostering continued engagement. Electronic Commerce Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-024-09918-2⁠
Smith, K. T. (2020). Marketing via smart speakers: What should Alexa say? Journal of Strategic Marketing, 28(4), 350–365. https://doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2018.1541924
Truong, T. T. H., & Chen, J. S. (2025). When empathy is enhanced by human–AI interaction: An investigation of anthropomorphism and responsiveness on customer experience with AI chatbots. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 37(12), 3908–3925. https://doi.org/10.1108/APJML-10-2024-1464⁠
Tunalı, S. B. (2016). Study on the effect of use of luxury brand during the social identity projection of individuals. The Turkish Online Journal of Design, Art and Communication, 6(3), 326–334. https://doi.org/10.7456/10603100/004
Uysal, E., Alavi, S., & Bezençon, V. (2023). Anthropomorphism in artificial intelligence: A review of empirical work across domains and insights for future research. In K. Sudhir & O. Toubia (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in marketing (Review of Marketing Research, Vol. 20, pp. 273–308). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1548-643520230000020015⁠
Vernuccio, M., Patrizi, M., Serić, M., & Pastore, A. (2023). The perceptual antecedents of brand anthropomorphism in the name-brand voice assistant context. Journal of Brand Management, 30(4), 302–317. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41262-022-00305-6⁠
Vernuccio, M., Boccalini, S., & Patrizi, M. (2025). “Being” with the brand in the metaverse: Strengthening brand anthropomorphism to foster brand love. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 84, 104204. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2024.104204⁠
Wang, Y., Sauka, K., & Situmeang, F. B. I. (2025). Anthropomorphism and transparency interplay on consumer behaviour in generative AI-driven marketing communication. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 42(4), 512–536. https://doi.org/10.1108/JCM-04-2024-6806 
Waytz, A., Morewedge, C. K., Epley, N., Monteleone, G., Gao, J.-H., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2010). Making sense by making sentient: Effectance motivation increases anthropomorphism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 410–435. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020240⁠
Xiang, L., & Park, H. J. (2024). Influence of mortality threats on anthropomorphized brand attitude: Role of control and connectedness motives. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 34(3), 417–431. https://doi.org/10.1108/JPBM-05-2023-4528⁠
Xu, J., Feng, Y., Li, W., Huang, Q., & Fan, Z. (2025). How AI brand endorsers influence Generation MZ’s consumer behavior in metaverse marketing scenarios. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 20(2), 82. https://doi.org/10.3390/jtaer20020082⁠
Ye, J., Zhou, X., Zhao, S., & Yua, B. (2026). Does brand anthropomorphism matter? Impact on brand loyalty and consumer decision-making. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102664. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102664⁠
Yurteri, S., Senyuz, A., & Essiz, O. (2026). Giving brands a human touch: Disentangling how anthropomorphic dimensions differentially influence consumers’ processing fluency and brand perceptions. Journal of Global Marketing. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1080/08911762.2026.2649739⁠
Zeugner-Roth, K. P., Fischer, P. M., & Hessel, I. M. (2025). Authentic brand ethicality: Conceptualization, measurement, and validation in the fashion industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 196(4), 883–915. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-024-05873-y⁠
Zhang, M., Li, L., Ye, Y., Qin, K., & Zhong, J. (2020). The effect of brand anthropomorphism, brand distinctiveness, and warmth on brand attitude: A mediated moderation model. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 19(5), 523–536. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1835⁠
Zhang, Y., Zhou, Y., Liu, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2023). Research on the influencing mechanism of the effect of brands’ sustainable behaviors on consumer attitudes: An empirical study on clothing brands. Sustainability, 15(3), 2351. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032351⁠
Zhao, Y., Zhou, S., & Kang, Q. (2024). It makes me happy: Anthropomorphism increases consumer preference for healthy food. British Food Journal, 126(10), 3605–3623. https://doi.org/10.1108/BFJ-12-2023-1078