نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی

نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی

پیکربندی راهبردهای دانش و نوآوری باز مبتنی بر سرمایۀ اجتماعی و پیامدهای رقابتی آن در بازارهای محلی

نوع مقاله : مقاله پژوهشی

نویسندگان
ایمان قاسمی همدانی 1
مریم اخوان خرازیان 2
سکینه ابراهیمی 3
1 دکترای تخصصی بازاریابی، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه محقق اردبیلی، اردبیل، ایران.
2 استادیار، دانشکده اقتصاد و حسابداری، دانشگاه شهید بهشتی، تهران، ایران.
3 دانشجوی دکترای بازاریابی، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی، دانشکده اقتصاد و مدیریت، دانشگاه ارومیه، ارومیه، ایران.
10.22070/cs.2026.21546.1472
چکیده
در فضای پویای کسب‌وکارهای امروزی، گذار از مدل‌های سنتی به سمت شبکه‌سازی‌های هوشمند، عامل حیاتی در بقا و پیشتازی در بازارهای محلی محسوب می‌شود. هدف این پژوهش، واکاوی پیکربندی راهبردهای دانش و نوآوری باز با تأکید بر سرمایه اجتماعی است تا از این طریق، چگونگی تبدیل شبکه‌های تعاملی به محرک ایجاد مزیت رقابتی شناسایی‌شده و الگویی کاربردی برای تقویت جایگاه بنگاه‌ها در اکوسیستم‌های منطقه‌ای ارائه گردد. پژوهش حاضر ازنظر هدف، کاربردی و ازنظر روش، توصیفی-تحلیلی با رویکرد پیمایشی است. جامعۀ آماری شامل کنشگران اقتصادی و نهادی فعال در بازارهای محلی روستایی شهرستان ارومیه است که در فرایندهای خلق، تبادل و بهره‌برداری از منابع دانشی نقش دارند. نمونه‌گیری به روش طبقه‌ای تصادفی انجام شد و حجم نمونه ۴۰۰ نفر تعیین گردید. داده‌ها از طریق پرسشنامه استاندارد جمع‌آوری شدند و روایی آن‌ها با روایی محتوایی، همگرا و واگرا و پایایی آن‌ها با پایایی ترکیبی و آلفای کرونباخ بررسی موردبررسی قرار گرفت. تحلیل داده‌ها با استفاده از روش حداقل مربعات جزئی و نرم‌افزار Smart PLS انجام گرفت. نتایج نشان داد سرمایه اجتماعی تأثیر مثبت و معناداری بر مدیریت دانش، نوآوری باز و کیفیت دانش ادراک‌شده دارد. مدیریت دانش و نوآوری باز نیز رابطه مثبت و معناداری با توسعه پایدار و بهبود موقعیت رقابتی نشان دادند. همچنین این متغیرها نقش میانجی مؤثری در انتقال اثر سرمایه اجتماعی به توسعه پایدار ایفا کردند. پنهان‌کاری دانش، روابط بین سرمایه اجتماعی، کیفیت دانش ادراک‌شده و توسعه پایدار را منفی تعدیل کرد، درحالی‌که رهبری جامعه اثر تقویت‌کننده‌ای بر رابطه مدیریت دانش و توسعه پایدار داشت. نتایج پژوهش نشان داد که سرمایۀ اجتماعی در ابعاد ساختاری، رابطه‌ای و شناختی، بستر اصلی تسهیم دانش و توسعه نوآوری باز را در جوامع محلی فراهم می‌آورد. این عامل از طریق تقویت فرایندهای دانشی و نوآورانه، نقش مهمی در تحقق توسعه پایدار و ارتقای موقعیت رقابتی ایفا می‌کند. یافته‌ها همچنین حاکی از آن است که مدیریت دانش، نوآوری باز و کیفیت دانش ادراک‌شده، سازوکارهای اصلی انتقال اثر سرمایه اجتماعی هستند. بر این اساس، برای فعال‌سازی ظرفیت‌های دانشی، کاهش پنهان‌کاری دانش و تقویت رهبری جامعه امری ضروری به نظر می‌رسد؛ ازاین‌رو، توصیه می‌شود مدیران و سیاست‌گذاران بر توسعه سرمایۀ اجتماعی، تقویت سازوکارهای دانشی و ترویج سبک رهبری در بازارهای محلی تمرکز کنند.
کلیدواژه‌ها
سرمایۀ اجتماعی
توسعه پایدار
مدیریت دانش
نوآوری باز
کیفیت دانش ادراک‌شده
پنهان‌کاری دانش

عنوان مقاله English

Configuring Knowledge and Innovation Strategies Based on Social Capital and Their Competitive Outcomes in Local Markets

نویسندگان English

Iman Ghasemi hamedani 1
maryam Akhavan kharazian 2
sakineh ebrahimi 3
1 PhD in Marketing, Department of Business Management, Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Mohaghegh Ardabili, Ardabil, Iran
2 Assistant Professor, Department of Management and Accounting, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran.
3 Ph.D. Student in Business Management, Marketing Concentration, Faculty of Economics and Management, Urmia University, Urmia, Iran.
چکیده English

Introduction and Purpose: In recent decades, profound economic, social, and technological transformations have demonstrated that economic growth alone is an insufficient metric for evaluating societal success. Escalating inequalities, resource constraints, declining social capital, and increasing environmental complexities have underscored the imperative of sustainable development. By emphasizing the equilibrium between economic, social, and institutional dimensions, sustainable development aims to foster long-term value creation, enhance systemic resilience, and safeguard the well-being of future generations. Local markets, serving as pivotal socio-economic platforms for value creation, play a decisive role in facilitating sustainable development. Beyond their primary economic functions, these markets function as critical arenas for social interaction, knowledge exchange, trust-building, and collective collaboration. Within this framework, open innovation—by facilitating knowledge flows, network-based interactions, and multi-actor cooperation—can bolster learning capabilities and support the generation of shared value. However, the efficacy of open innovation is contingent upon the presence of social capital, trust, shared norms, and robust relational networks. Social capital fosters innovation by strengthening cooperation, facilitating knowledge transfer, and mitigating interaction costs. Concurrently, knowledge management plays a fundamental role in transforming social capacities into structured processes of knowledge creation, sharing, and utilization, thereby underpinning sustainable development. Conversely, detrimental behaviors such as knowledge hiding can erode trust, impede knowledge flows, and constrain collective learning and innovation. In such contexts, community leadership may serve as a facilitating mechanism by enhancing participation, coordination, and trust among community members. Despite extensive research, the simultaneous interaction among social capital, knowledge management, open innovation, and boundary factors—specifically knowledge hiding and community leadership—in achieving the sustainable development of local markets remains insufficiently explored. This study aims to develop an integrated framework to examine these interrelationships and provide strategic insights for enhancing innovation, resilience, and sustainable value creation in local markets.
Methodology: This study employs a quantitative, applied, and descriptive-analytical approach to examine the relationships among social capital, knowledge management, open innovation, and the determinants of rural local market development via a survey method. The statistical population comprises economic and institutional actors active in the rural local markets of Urmia County, including farmers, cooperative members, local managers, and village council members. Utilizing stratified random sampling, the sample size was estimated at approximately 400 participants using the Soper (2025) calculator for structural equation modeling (SEM). Data were collected through a structured 40-item questionnaire utilizing a five-point Likert scale. Furthermore, the instrument’s psychometric properties were rigorously assessed, confirming content validity, convergent validity (AVE), discriminant validity (based on the Fornell–Larcker criterion), and reliability through Cronbach’s alpha and composite reliability (CR).
Finding: Factor analysis revealed that all measurement item loadings, with the exception of the final sustainable development item, exceeded 0.4, and t-values surpassed the 1.96 threshold, thereby validating the indicators. Reliability coefficients for all constructs were above 0.7, indicating satisfactory measurement reliability. Convergent validity was established through AVE values exceeding 0.5, while the Fornell–Larcker criterion verified discriminant validity, as the square root of the AVE for each construct was greater than its correlations with other constructs. The structural model was evaluated using R2R^2R2, Q2Q^2Q2, and Goodness-of-Fit (GOF) criteria. The results demonstrated strong explanatory power for sustainable development, moderate levels for perceived knowledge quality, and relatively lower levels for knowledge management and open innovation. The Q2Q^2Q2 values indicated robust predictive capability, with sustainable development exhibiting strong prediction, while other constructs showed moderate predictive power. Overall, the findings confirm the acceptable fit of the model and its capacity to explain the complex relationships among the research constructs.
Discussion and Conclusion: The comprehensive findings of this study indicate that achieving sustainable development in local markets necessitates a simultaneous focus on social, knowledge-based, and innovation-oriented factors. The results underscore that social capital, serving as the bedrock for trust, cooperation, and actor interaction, plays a pivotal role in fortifying knowledge and innovation capacities. Indeed, robust social relationships and effective networks establish the prerequisite conditions for knowledge sharing, collective learning, and sustainable value creation. Furthermore, the findings demonstrate that knowledge management and open innovation function as critical mechanisms for translating social capacities into developmental outcomes. By facilitating knowledge flows, enhancing learning processes, and strengthening adaptive capabilities, these mechanisms contribute significantly to sustainable development. Additionally, perceived knowledge quality is central to the efficacy of developmental processes, as knowledge yields a sustainable advantage only when it is perceived as reliable, useful, and applicable. Ultimately, the findings suggest that sustainable development is not the product of a single determinant but emerges from the synergistic interaction among social capital, knowledge management, innovation, knowledge quality, and supportive factors such as community leadership. Consequently, fostering collaboration, promoting knowledge sharing, and cultivating a trust-based environment are essential to enhancing resilience, innovation, and long-term value creation in local markets.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

Sustainable Development
Social Capital
Knowledge Quality
Knowledge Management
Open Innovation
Knowledge Hiding
Leadership
ابراهیمی، کریم , نژادفلاح، محسن و رحمانی، جعفر. (1404). نقش بسترهای اجتماعی گروه‌های تبلیغی در تقویت سرمایة اجتماعی. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 3(12)، 235-251. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2025.393615.2587
استاک، روح‌الله و عبدالملکی، جمال. (1393). بررسی و تبیین تأثیر سرمایه اجتماعی بر نوآوری با تأکید بر نقش میانجی مدیریت دانش. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 1(1)، 1-20.  doi: 10.22059/jscm.2014.53270
آدم زاده، عفت و اتون، منیره. (1404). رهبری تحول‌گرا و نوآوری آموزشی: بررسی نقش میانجی سرمایه اجتماعی در مدارس شهرستان سرباز. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 13(1)، 19-36.   doi: 10.22059/jscm.2025.399366.2613
جرفی، حسن. (1402). نقش هوش سیاسی و سرمایة اجتماعی بر مدیریت تغییر اثربخش در بین کارکنان سازمان آب و برق خوزستان. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 10(4)، 383-395. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2023.363038.2433
خالقی نژاد، سیدعلی. (1404). ارتقای سرمایة اجتماعی از طریق مشارکت سازمان‌های غیردولتی (ملی و بین‌المللی) در توسعة اوان کودکی ایران: یک مطالعة سیاست‌ـ پژوهشی کیفی. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 12(3)، 305-319. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2025.397758.2606
درمنش، ارشیا ، زبردست، لعبت و بالیست، جهانبخش. (1404). ارائه چارچوبی برای تلفیق شاخص‌های کیفیت زیستگاه در برنامه‌ریزی شهری به‌منظور بهبود زیست‌پذیری و توسعه پایدار (مطالعه موردی: کلان‌شهر تهران). فصلنامه علمی مدیریت محیط‌زیست شهری، 3(4)، 19-36.
راغبی، محمد و یزدانی، ناصر. (1401). تأثیر ابعاد تمرکز استراتژیک بر سرمایه رابطه-ای در شرکت‌های خانوادگی و غیرخانوادگی بورس اوراق بهادار تهران. نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی، 19(20)، 51-72. doi: 10.22070/cs.2023.17667.1305
رضایی، هانیه و خنیفر، حسین. (1402). مروری بر سرمایه اجتماعی، نوآوری و شبکه نوآوری: تحلیل کتاب‌سنجی از ادبیات. مجله علمی مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی،
doi: 10.22059/jscm.2024.369931.2476
طاهری، فاطمه و فروتن اقلیدی، علی‌اصغر. (1404). پرورش سرمایة اجتماعی در سازمان در پرتو رهبری جان‌نثار. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 12(3)، 289-303.  doi: 10.22059/jscm.2025.393730.2588
عسگری، ناصر ، مهری، داریوش ، قرآنی، سید فرامرز و نهادی، هادی. (1403). فراترکیب پیشایندها و رهاوردهای توسعۀ سرمایۀ اجتماعی در مطالعات سازمانی ایران. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 11(4)، 371-388. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2024.374897.2498
قادری، فرشاد، اکبری، محسن، تاجدینی، کیهان و دوستار، محمد. (1402). تأثیر بهسازی راهبردی بر عملکرد کسب‌وکارهای خانوادگی با نقش میانجی یادگیری راهبردی و نقش تعدیل گر اشتراک دانش. نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی، 20(22)، 241-261. doi: 10.22070/cs.2025.19867.1407
قادری، فرشاد و ملک اخلاق، اسماعیل. (1400). بررسی نقش واسط دوسوتوانی مدیریت در رابطه بین قصد استراتژیک و استراتژی رقابت همکاری با نقش تعدیل گر اشتراک دانش. نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی، 18(17)، 99-120. doi: 10.22070/cs.2022.14372.1107
نامداری، فاطمه ، طاهری گودرزی، حجت ، عباس‌زادة سهرون، یداله و امیرنژاد، قنبر. (1404). طراحی الگوی دموکراسی سازمانی در جهت تحقق سرمایة اجتماعی. مجله علمی «مدیریت سرمایه اجتماعی»، 12(2)، 187-203. doi: 10.22059/jscm.2024.376531.2512
References
Adhikari, D. R., & Shrestha, P. (2023). Knowledge management initiatives for achieving sustainable development goal 4.7: higher education institutions’ stakeholder perspectives. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 1109-1139.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-03-2022-0172
Agarwal, A., & Ojha, R. (2024). Prioritizing implications of Industry-4.0 on the sustainable development goals: A perspective from the analytic hierarchy process in manufacturing operations. Journal of cleaner production, 444, 141189.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2024.141189
Ali, L., & Avdic, A. (2015). A Knowledge Management Framework for Sustainable Rural Development: The case of Gilgit‑Baltistan, Pakistan. Electronic Journal of Knowledge Management, 13(2), pp104-117. https://doi.org/10.1017/j.jclepro.2015.144389‏
Anand, A., Offergelt, F., & Anand, P. (2022). Knowledge hiding–a systematic review and research agenda. Journal of Knowledge Management, 26(6), 1438-1457.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-04-2021-0336
Annamalah, S., Paraman, P., Ahmed, S., Dass, R., Sentosa, I., Pertheban, T. R., ... & Singh, P. (2023). The role of open innovation and a normalizing mechanism of social capital in the tourism industry. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 9(2), 100056.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joitmc.2023.100056
Arain, M. I., Shahnaz, S., Anwar, R., & Anwar, K. (2021). Assessment of self-medication practices during COVID-19 pandemic in Hyderabad and Karachi, Pakistan. Sudan Journal of Medical Sciences, 16(3), 347-354.‏ https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1797-9927
Asgari, N. , Mehri, D. , Ghorani, F. and Nahadi, H. (2024). Meta-Synthesis of Antecedents and Outcomes of Developing Social Capital in the Organizational Studies of Iran. Social Capital Management, 11(4), 371-388. https://doi: 10.22059/jscm.2024.374897.2498[In Persian] 
Astak, R. and Abdolmaleki, J. (2014). Study of the Effect of Social Capital on Innovation Emphasize on Mediation Role of Knowledge Management. Social Capital Management, 1(1), 1-20. https://doi: 10.22059/jscm.2014.53270 [In Persian] 
Bakhmat, N., Voropayeva, T., Artamoshchenko, V., Kubitskyi, S., & Ivanov, G. (2022). QUALITY MANAGEMENT IN HIGHER EDUCATION IN TERMS OF SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT. International Journal for Quality Research, 16(4).‏ https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR16.04-10
Bass, B. M. (1999). Two decades of research and development in transformational leadership. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 8(1), 9–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/135943299398410
Bhalla, K., Kumar, T., & Rangaswamy, J. (2018). An integrated rural development model based on comprehensive Life-Cycle Assessment (LCA) of Khadi-Handloom Industry in rural India. Procedia CIRP, 69, 493-498. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.11.072
Bouças da Silva, D. L., Hoffmann, V. E., & Martínez-Cháfer, L. (2023). Trust and trust-linked elements in the formation of tourism networks in Brazil and Spain. Journal of Trust Research, 13(1), 24-50.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/21515581.2023.2190900
Cammarano, A., Aquilone, G., Varriale, V., Michelino, F., & Caputo, M. (2024). The potential of open innovation platforms: driving sustainable development goals through digital collaboration. Innovation, 1-24.‏ https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2024.2421015
Carvalho, N., Zanquetto-Filho, H., Hoffmann, V. E., & Lacruz, A. J. (2025). Social ties and open innovation: impacts on innovation capability. Innovation & Management Review.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/INMR-09-2023-0145
Chen, H., Cao, G., Chen, J., & Ding, J. (2019, August). A practical framework for evaluating the quality of knowledge graph. In China conference on knowledge graph and semantic computing (pp. 111-122). Singapore: Springer Singapore.‏ https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2019.3150080
Chen, M.H. and Wang, M.C. (2008), “Social networks and a new venture’s innovative capability: the role of trust within entrepreneurial teams”, R&d Management, Vol. 38 No. 3, pp. 253-264. https://doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9310.2008.00515.x.
Chin, W. W. (1998). The partial least squares approach to structural equation modeling. Modern Methods for Business Research, 295(2), 295-336. https://B2n.ir/p53562
Chiu, C. M., Hsu, M. H., & Wang, E. T. (2006). Understanding knowledge sharing in virtual communities: An integration of social capital and social cognitive theories. Decision support systems, 42(3), 1872-1888.‏ http://dx.doi.org/10.6007/IJARBSS/v15-i1/24548
Connelly, C. E., Zweig, D., Webster, J., & Trougakos, J. P. (2012). Knowledge hiding in organizations. Journal of organizational behavior, 33(1), 64-88.‏ https://doi.org/10.25115/eea.v39i10.5392
Danso, A., Adomako, S., Lartey, T., Amankwah-Amoah, J., & Owusu-Yirenkyi, D. (2020). Stakeholder integration, environmental sustainability orientation and financial performance. Journal of business research, 119, 652-662.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.02.038
Dormanesh,A. , Zebardast,L. and Balist,J. (2025). Introducing a Framework for Integrating Habitat Quality Indicators into Urban Planning to Improve Livability and Sustainable Development (Case Study: Tehran Metropolis). Journal of Urban Environmental Management, 3(4), 19-36. https://doi: 10.48306/juem.2025.554009.1121 [In Persian] 
Ebrahimi, K. , Nezhadfallah, M. and Rahmani, J. (2025). Identifying the Role of Social Context of Preach Groups in Strengthening Social Capital. Social Capital Management, 12(3), 235-251. https://doi: 10.22059/jscm.2025.393615.2587 [In Persian] 
Fauzi, M. A. (2023). Knowledge hiding behavior in higher education institutions: a scientometric analysis and systematic literature review approach. Journal of knowledge management, 27(2), 302-327.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-07-2021-0527
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50.‏ https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Ghaderi, F., Akbari, M., Tajeddini, K., & Doostar, M. (2024). Investigating the Effect of Strategic Improvement on Family Business Performance: The Mediating Role of Strategic Learning and the Moderating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Commercial Strategies, 20(22), 241-261. https://doi: 10.22070/cs.2025.19867.1407 [In Persian]
ghaderi, F., & Malekakhlagh, I. (2021). Studying the Mediating Role of Management Ambidexterity Between Strategic Intent and Cooperation Competition Strategy with the Moderating Role of Knowledge Sharing. Commercial Strategies, 18(17), 99-120. https://doi: 10.22070/cs.2022.14372.1107[In Persian]
Hair, J. F., Risher, J. J., Sarstedt, M., & Ringle, C. M. (2019). When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2-24. https:// doi:10.1108/EBR-11-2018- 0203
He, P., Jiang, C., Xu, Z., & Shen, C. (2021). Knowledge hiding: current research status and future research directions. Frontiers in psychology, 12, 748237.‏ https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.748237
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sinkovics, R. R. (2009). The use of partial least squares path  modeling in international marketing. Advances in International Marketing, 20, 277-319. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1474-7979(2009)0000020014
Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic management journal, 20(2), 195-204. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2%3C195::AID-SMJ13%3E3.0.CO;2-7
Jordão, R. V. D., & Novas, J. C. (2024). Information and knowledge management, intellectual capital, and sustainable growth in networked small and medium enterprises. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 15(1), 563-595.‏ https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-022-01043-5
Jorfi, H. (2023). The Role of Political Intelligence and Social Capital on Effective Change Management in Khuzestan Water and Electricity Organization Employees. Social Capital Management, 10(4), 383-395. https://doi: 10.22059/jscm.2023.363038.2433[In Persian]
Juusola, K., Venkitachalam, K., Kleber, D., & Popat, A. (2024). Knowledge sharing in open social innovation for sustainable development: evidence from rural social enterprises. Journal of Strategy and Management.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JSMA-12-2023-0322
Kearns, G. S., & Sabherwal, R. (2006). Strategic alignment between business and information technology: a knowledge-based view of behaviors, outcome, and consequences. Journal of management information systems, 23(3), 129-162.‏ https://doi.org/10.2753/MIS0742-1222230306
Khaleghinezhad, S. A. (2025). Fostering Social Capital through NGO Engagement in Early Childhood Development in Iran: A Qualitative Policy Research Study. Social Capital Management, 12(3), 305-319. https://doi.org/ 10.22059/jscm.2025.397758.2606 [In Persian] 
Kim, N., & Shim, C. (2018). Social capital, knowledge sharing and innovation of small- and mediumsized enterprises in a tourism cluster. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 30(6), 2417–2437. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJCHM-07-2016-0392
Lam, L., Nguyen, P., Le, N., & Tran, K. (2021). The relation among organizational culture, knowledge management, and innovation capability: Its implication for open innovation. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(1), 66.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/joitmc7010066
Lappalainen, L., Aleem, M., & Sandberg, B. (2023). How to manage open innovation projects? An integrative framework. Project Leadership and Society, 4, 100095, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plas.2023.100095
Lee, D. M., Fu, Y. X., Wang, L. Y., & Nie, T. (2021). Network ties, social capital, and knowledge management. European Journal of Business and Management Research, 6(5), 200-203.‏ https://doi.org/10.24018/ejbmr.2021.6.5.1090
Lim, W.M. (2024), “A typology of validity: content, face, convergent, discriminant, nomological and predictive validity”, Journal of Trade Science, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 155-179. https://doi.org/10.1108/JTS-03-2024-0016
Martinidis, G., Komninos, N., Dyjakon, A., Minta, S., & Hejna, M. (2021). How intellectual capital predicts innovation output in EU regions: Implications for sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(24), 14036.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su132414036
Miković, R., Čabarkapa, O., Viduka, B., & Berić, I. (2023). Social capital features navigating the quality of knowledge management process in project-oriented organizations. International Journal for Quality Research, 17(4), 1011-1024.‏ https://doi.org/10.24874/IJQR17.04-01
Namdari, F. , Taheri Goodarzi, H. , Abbaszadeh Sohronh, Y. and Amirnejad, Q. (2025). Design of Organizational Democracy Model in Order to Realize Social Capital. Social Capital Management, 12(2), 187-203. https://doi: 10.22059/jscm.2024.376531.2512[In Persian] 
Ozili, P. K. (2022). Sustainability and sustainable development research around the world. Managing Global Transitions, 20(3).‏ https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.20.259-293
Phonthanukitithaworn, C., Srisathan, W. A., Ketkaew, C., & Naruetharadhol, P. (2023). Sustainable development towards openness SME innovation: taking advantage of intellectual capital, sustainable initiatives, and open innovation. Sustainability, 15(3), 2126.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su15032126
Portes, A. (2024). Social capital: Its origins and applications in modern sociology. New critical writings in political sociology, 53-76.‏ 10.4324/9781003572923‑6
Prieto-Pastor, J. A., Popa, S., & Direito, I. (2018). Knowledge integration and collective creativity: The moderating role of team knowledge diversity. The Journal of Management Studies, 55(8), 1234-1264. https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2018-10-12-49
Purwati, A. A., Budiyanto, B., Suhermin, S., & Hamzah, M. L. (2021). The effect of innovation capability on business performance: The role of social capital and entrepreneurial leadership on SMEs in Indonesia. Growing Science: Accounting, 7(2), 323-330.‏ https://repository.stiesia.ac.id/id/eprint/3911
Radziwon, A., & Bogers, M. (2019). Open innovation in SMEs: Exploring inter-organizational relationships in an ecosystem. Technological forecasting and social change, 146, 573-587.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.04.021
Raghebi, M., & Yazdani, N. (2023). The Effect of Strategic Focus Dimensions on Relational Capital in Family and Non-Family Firms in the Tehran Stock ExChange. Commercial Strategies, 19(20), 51-72. https://doi: 10.22070/cs.2023.17667.1305[In Persian] 
Rami, A. A. M., Azizul, M. D. A., Ismail, S., Ibrahim, A., & Olaitan, A. A. (2023). Knowledge Management, Leadership, and Social Capital: Community Leadership and Sustainable Development in Terengganu, Malaysia.‏ https://doi.org/10.61275/ISVSej-2023-10-12-49
Rangus, K. (2017). The Relation between Different Open Innovation Practices and Firm's Innovation Performance. Managing Global Transitions: International Research Journal, 15(1).‏ https://doi.org/10.26493/1854-6935.15.61-79
Rezaei, H. and Khanifar, H. (2026). The Framework of the Relationship Between the Components of Social Capital and Innovation Using Meta-Synthesis Method. Social Capital Management, 13(1), 37-55. https://doi: 10.22059/jscm.2023.355084.2390 [In Persian] 
Reus, B., Moser, C., & Groenewegen, P. (2023). Knowledge sharing quality on an enterprise social network: social capital and the moderating effect of being a broker. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(11), 187-204.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2023-0115
Ruggerio, C. A. (2021). Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions. Science of the total environment, 786, 147481.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147481
Saravanan, D. J. D., Sreeram, A., Krishna, S., Subrahmanyam, C. M., Kumar, M., & Murty, K. V. S. S. N. (2025). THE IMPACT OF SOCIAL CAPITAL ON KNOWLEDGE QUALITY AND OPEN INNOVATION: THE INFLUENCE OF KNOWLEDGE HIDING AS A MODERATING FACTOR. International Journal of Humanities Education, 13(1), 1156-1172.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/JKM-02-2025-0115
Singh, S. K., Mazzucchelli, A., Vessal, S. R., & Solidoro, A. (2021). Knowledge-based HRM practices and innovation performance: Role of social capital and knowledge sharing. Journal of International Management, 27(1), 100830.‏
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2021.100830.
Snapp, S. S., Bezner Kerr, R., Bybee‐Finley, A., Chikowo, R., Dakishoni, L., Grabowski, P., ... & Kanyama‐Phiri, G. (2023). Participatory action research generates knowledge for Sustainable Development Goals. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 21(7), 341-349.‏ https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2591
Taheri, F. and Foroutan Eghlidi, A. A. (2025). Cultivating Social Capital in the Organization in the Light of Self-Sacrifice Leadership. Social Capital Management, 12(3), 289-303. https://doi.org/10.22059/jscm.2025.393730.2588 [In Persian] 
Tajpour, M., Hosseini, E., Mohammadi, M., & Bahman-Zangi, B. (2022). The effect of knowledge management on the sustainability of technology-driven businesses in emerging markets: The mediating role of social media. Sustainability, 14(14), 8602.‏ https://doi.org/10.3390/su14148602
Tariq, M. U. (2025). Leveraging Open Innovation for Sustainable Growth in the Digital Era. In Mastering Innovation in Business (pp. 157-192). IGI Global.‏ https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-3759-2.ch007
Waheed, M., Klobas, J. E., & Ain, N. (2021). Unveiling knowledge quality, researcher satisfaction, learning, and loyalty: A model of academic social media success. Information Technology & People, 34(1), 204-227.‏ https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-07-2018-0345
Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schröder, G., & Van Oppen, C. (2009). Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration. MIS quarterly, 177-195. https://doi.org/10.2307/20650284
Xue, B., & Zou, L. (2022). Knowledge graph quality management: A comprehensive survey. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 35(5), 4969-4988.‏ https://doi.org/10.1109/TKDE.2022.3150080
Yin, X., Chen, J., & Li, J. (2022). Rural innovation system: Revitalize the countryside for a sustainable development. Journal of Rural Studies, 93, 471-478 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.10.014
Zhang, X., Chu, Z., Ren, L., & Xing, J. (2023). Open innovation and sustainable competitive advantage: The role of organizational learning. Technological forecasting and social change, 186, 122114.‏ https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2022.12211410
نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی
دوره 22، شماره 25
شهریور 1404
صفحه 53-80