نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی

نشریه علمی راهبردهای بازرگانی

تبیین و آزمون تجربی مدل عوامل فردی، فرهنگی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی مؤثر بر رفتار مصرف پایدار در میان مصرف‌کنندگان ایران

نوع مقاله : مقاله مستخرج از رساله دکتری

نویسندگان
1 دانشجوی دکتری ، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
2 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران.
3 استاد، گروه مدیریت بازرگانی دانشکده مدیریت و اقتصاد، دانشگاه آزاد اسلامی واحد علوم و تحقیقات، تهران، ایران
چکیده
این پژوهش باهدف تبیین و آزمون تجربی مدل عوامل فردی، فرهنگی، اجتماعی و اقتصادی مؤثر بر رفتار مصرف پایدار در میان مصرف‌کنندگان ایرانی انجام شد. مطالعه حاضر با رویکرد آمیخته اکتشافی و در دو بخش کیفی و کمی اجرا گردید. در مرحله کیفی، با بهره‌گیری از نظریه‌پردازی داده بنیاد و مصاحبه با خبرگان بازاریابی و محیط‌زیست، ابعاد و مؤلفه‌های رفتار مصرف پایدار در ایران شناسایی و مدل مفهومی اولیه تدوین شد. سپس در مرحله کمی، پرسش‌نامه محقق‌ساخته مبتنی بر یافته‌های کیفی برای ۳۹۲ نفر از مصرف‌کنندگان بالای ۱۸ سال توزیع شد و داده‌ها با مدل‌یابی معادلات ساختاری و روش حداقل مربعات جزئی تحلیل گردید.
نتایج نشان داد سازه‌های فردی، فرهنگیاجتماعی، اقتصادی و نهادی سهم قابل‌توجهی در تبیین دو بعد اصلی رفتار مصرف پایدار یعنی «بهینه‌سازی مصرف منابع» و «انتخاب محصولات سبز» دارند. آگاهی و آموزش زیست‌محیطی و ارزش‌های اجتماعی قوی‌ترین پیش‌بین‌های رفتار مصرف پایدار بودند، درحالی‌که نگرانی برای آینده، علیرغم معناداری، اثر ضعیف‌تری نشان داد. در سطح اقتصادی، وضعیت معیشتی خانوار، قیمت و دسترسی به محصولات پایدار نقش تعیین‌کننده‌ای در رفتار مصرف‌کننده داشت. یافته‌ها همچنین نشان داد که حمایت‌های دولتی و تبلیغات سبز موجود هنوز اثرگذاری مطلوبی بر رفتار پایدار ندارند و حتی در مواردی اثر منفی دارند.
تحلیل پیامدها نیز بیانگر آن بود که بهینه‌سازی مصرف و انتخاب محصولات پایدار به‌طور معناداری به کاهش آسیب‌های زیست‌محیطی، بهبود کیفیت زندگی و تقویت توسعه پایدار منجر می‌شوند. ادغام یافته‌های کیفی و کمی نشان داد که رفتار مصرف پایدار در ایران حاصل برهم‌کنش پیچیده مجموعه‌ای از عوامل فردی، هنجارهای فرهنگی، محدودیت‌های اقتصادی و شرایط نهادی است. بر این اساس، پیشنهاد می‌شود سیاست‌های آموزشی، اصلاحات اقتصادی، افزایش شفافیت اطلاعاتی و بازطراحی پیام‌های فرهنگی و رسانه‌ای در جهت تقویت رفتار مصرف پایدار بازنگری و تقویت شوند.
کلیدواژه‌ها

عنوان مقاله English

Conceptualization and Empirical Test of a Model of Individual, Cultural, Social and Economic Factors Affecting Sustainable Consumption Behavior among Iranian Consumers

نویسندگان English

maryam Behzadi 1
karim hamdi 2
hossein vazifehdust 3
1 Ph.D. candidate of Business Management - Marketing Management, Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
2 Karim Hamdi, Professor, , Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
3 Hossein Vazifehdust, Professor, , Faculty of Management and Economics, Islamic Azad University, Science and Research Branch, Tehran, Iran
چکیده English

Introduction and Problem Statement:In the contemporary era, the escalation of environmental crises and resource depletion has necessitated a paradigm shift from conventional to sustainable consumption patterns. Sustainable consumption behavior (SCB) is no longer a peripheral concern but has become a central pillar of global environmental policy and corporate strategy. Despite extensive research, most existing models predominantly focus on Western contexts or rely on relatively narrow psychological frameworks, such as the Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB). However, SCB in emerging economies, particularly in Iran, is a complex phenomenon shaped by a unique interplay of traditional values, social pressures, and volatile economic conditions. This study addresses a significant research gap by proposing an integrated framework that explores how individual, cultural, social, and economic factors collectively influence two critical dimensions of SCB: Resource Optimization and Green Product Selection. The primary objective is to move beyond the “intention–action gap” and empirically test a holistic model that captures the socio-economic realities of Iranian consumers.
Theoretical Framework and Methodology:The theoretical foundation of this research is built upon an interdisciplinary approach that integrates environmental psychology with socio-economic theories. We conceptualize SCB as the outcome of four distinct yet interrelated clusters:
Individual Factors: Internal drivers, including environmental awareness, personal responsibility, and pro-environmental attitudes.
Cultural Factors: Macro-level influences, such as collective values, lifestyle patterns, and traditional sustainability norms.
Social Factors: Meso-level drivers, including peer influence, family dynamics, and social status.
Economic Factors: Structural drivers, including affordability, perceived cost–benefit ratios, and market accessibility.
To test this model, a quantitative research design was employed. Data were collected through a structured survey administered to a diverse sample of Iranian consumers. The analysis was conducted using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), a robust method suitable for testing complex structural models with high predictive accuracy.
Empirical Results and Findings:The measurement model was rigorously evaluated in terms of reliability and validity. The results confirmed excellent psychometric properties:
Reliability: Cronbach’s alpha (α = 0.824) and Composite Reliability (CR > 0.70) exceeded the recommended thresholds, indicating high internal consistency.
Validity: Average Variance Extracted (AVE > 0.50) confirmed convergent validity, while the Fornell–Larcker criterion supported discriminant validity.
The structural model analysis revealed substantial explanatory power, far exceeding that of typical behavioral models reported in the literature:
Explanatory Power: The model explained 73.4% of the variance in Resource Optimization (R² = 0.734) and 71.4% of the variance in Green Product Selection (R² = 0.714).
Model Fit: The Goodness-of-Fit (GoF) index was calculated at 0.678, indicating a strong fit between the proposed model and the empirical data.
Key findings indicate that, while individual awareness is a necessary prerequisite, the social and cultural context often acts as the primary catalyst or barrier to sustainable consumption behavior. Cultural factors were found to exert a significant moderating effect on the translation of personal attitudes into actual behavior. Furthermore, economic factors emerged as a critical constraint, particularly with regard to the price sensitivity associated with green products under the current economic conditions in Iran.
Discussion and Managerial Implications:The results demonstrate that SCB in Iran is a highly contextualized form of behavior. The high R² values suggest that the inclusion of social and economic variables provides a considerably more accurate prediction of consumer behavior than individual-centric models. One of the most striking findings is the “Value–Action Gap,” whereby high levels of environmental awareness do not necessarily translate into green purchasing behavior because of economic barriers and social norms that continue to favor conventional consumption patterns.
Managerial and Policy Implications:For Policymakers: Governments should move beyond awareness-raising campaigns and focus on structural incentives. Reducing the “green premium” (i.e., the additional cost associated with sustainable products) through subsidies or tax incentives is essential for increasing market penetration.
1. For Marketers: Companies should leverage social proof and culturally relevant storytelling. Since social and cultural factors are powerful drivers of behavior, marketing strategies should frame sustainable consumption not merely as an “ethical choice” but as a “socially desirable lifestyle” aligned with local values.
2. For NGOs: Environmental organizations should focus on community-based interventions that normalize resource optimization practices (e.g., energy and water conservation) as a collective social responsibility.
Conclusion and Originality:This study contributes to the literature by providing one of the first comprehensive empirical tests of a multidimensional SCB model in the Middle East. Its originality lies in the integration of economic and cultural constraints within a structural equation modeling framework, thereby offering a high-resolution perspective on the Iranian consumer. The findings suggest that achieving sustainability goals requires a synchronized effort across individual, social, cultural, and economic spheres. Future research should consider longitudinal research designs to examine how changing economic conditions further influence these behavioral drivers.

کلیدواژه‌ها English

sustainable consumption behavior
individual factors
cultural factors
social factors
economic factors
جعفری، م.، موسوی، ر. و شادمان، ن. (1399). بررسی تأثیر سبک زندگی بر رفتار مصرف سبز در میان شهروندان تهرانی. محیط‌زیست و توسعه پایدار، 10(2)، 45–62.
https://sanad.iau.ir/Journal/jgm/Article/992758
عباسی اسفنجانی، ح. و خدایی گرگری، م.ت. (1396). بررسی تأثیر عوامل اجتماعی و روان‌شناختی بر رفتار مصرف‌کننده سبز با نقش میانجی رفتارهای زیست‌محیطی و قصد خرید سبز. دوماهنامه بررسی‌های بازرگانی، 15(86–87)، 45–58.
https://barresybazargani.itsr.ir/article_33246.html
مهربان، ر. و رضائی، ر. (1400). عوامل مرتبط با رفتار مصرف محیط‌زیستی پایدار روستاییان. آموزش محیط زیست و توسعه پایدار، 10(2), 153–168.
https://ee.journals.pnu.ac.ir/article_8497.html
 
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
Akpinar, B., Yildirim, S., & Dönmez, B. (2023). Environmental factors affecting green purchase behavior of consumers: Mediating role of environmental attitude. Cleaner Environmental Systems, 10, 100130. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cesys.2023.100130
Bengtsson, M., Alfredsson, E., Cohen, M., Lorek, S., & Schroeder, P. (2018). Transforming consumption towards better futures. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.05.230
Bryman, A. (2016). Social research methods (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Sage.
Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers’ perspective. Canadian Social Science, 6(2), 66–73. https://doi.org/10.3968/j.css.1923669720100602.007
Chen, Y. S. (2010). The drivers of green brand equity: Green brand image, green satisfaction, and green trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(2), 307–319. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0223-9
Cherrier, H., & Black, I. R. (2010). Anti-consumption as part of living a sustainable lifestyle. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9(6), 437–453. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.331
Chin, W. W., & Newsted, P. R. (1999). Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 307–341). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483328126.n12
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (2015). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (4th ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781452230153
Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00855.x
Diprose, G., Thomas, A. C., & Bond, S. (2019). Practices of sustainable living: A review. Sustainability, 11(3), 684. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11030684
D’Souza, C. (2004). Ecolabels and green products. Australasian Marketing Journal, 12(3), 22–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1441-3582(04)70083-8
Dimitrova, T., Ilieva, I., & Angelova, M. (2022). Exploring factors shaping sustainable consumption behaviour. Administrative Sciences, 12(4), 155. https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci12040155
Elhoushy, S., & Lanzini, P. (2020). The credibility of green advertising: A systematic literature review. Journal of Business Research, 119, 742–753. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2020.03.054
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? Field Methods, 18(1), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X05279903
Guzmán Rincón, A., Martinez, C., & Torres, R. (2021). Drivers of sustainable purchase intention. Sustainability, 13(10), 5432. https://doi.org/10.3390/su13105432
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2017). A primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‑SEM) (2nd ed.). Sage. https://doi.org/10.15358/9783800653614
Hanss, D., Böhm, G., Doran, R., & Homburg, A. (2016). Sustainable consumption of groceries in Europe. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 79–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.05.002
Hayward, B., & Roy, D. (2019). Children, citizenship and environment: Nurturing a democratic imagination in a changing world. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315067421
Hoffmann, R., et al. (2019). Understanding pro-environmental purchase behaviour. Sustainability, 11(6), 1567. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11061567
Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). Guilford Press.
Li, M. L. (2020). Review of consumers’ green consumption behavior. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 10(3), 585–599. https://doi.org/10.4236/ajibm.2020.103039
Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2012). Sources of method bias in social science research and recommendations on how to control it. Annual Review of Psychology, 63, 539–569. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-120710-100452
Randall, W. S., et al. (2024). Sustainable consumption research: A comprehensive review. Sustainability, 16(1), 411. https://doi.org/10.3390/su16010411
Ruby, M. B., Klas, A., & Heine, S. J. (2020). Consumer attitudes towards sustainable diets. Nutrition Reviews, 78(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/nutrit/nuz067
Sadeghidazaki, M., Molla, J., & Rezaei, M. (2022). Measuring sustainable consumer behavior. Appetite, 172, 105951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2022.105951
Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Smith, D., Reams, R., & Hair, J. F. (2022). Partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS‑SEM): A useful tool for family business researchers. Journal of Family Business Strategy, 13(3), 100510. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfbs.2020.100510
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018). Saturation in qualitative research. Qualitative Research, 18(4), 189–206. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794117714425
Schaar, J., & Reiser, D. (2023). Sustainable consumption transitions: Pathways and challenges. Journal of Consumer Policy, 46(2), 233–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10603-022-09510-3
Schmitt, M. T., Aknin, L. B., Axsen, J., & Shwom, R. L. (2018). Pro-environmental behavior and life satisfaction. Ecological Economics, 143, 130–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2017.07.007
Schultz, P. W., Zelezny, L. C., & Dalrymple, N. J. (2000). The relation between environmental concern and environmentally responsible behavior. Environment and Behavior, 32(4), 576–591. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160021972634
Schwartz, S. H. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in Experimental Social Psychology (Vol. 10, pp. 221–279). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60358-5
Sesini, G., Castiglioni, C., & Lozza, E. (2020). Sustainable consumption: A research agenda. Sustainability, 12(15), 5935. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12155935
Shove, E. (2003). Comfort, cleanliness and convenience: The social organization of normality. Berg Publishers. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781847888648
Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Abel, T., Guagnano, G. A., & Kalof, L. (1999). A value‑belief‑norm theory of support for social movements: The case of environmentalism. Human Ecology Review, 6(2), 81–97. http://www.humanecologyreview.org/pastissues/her62/62stern.pdf
Tenenhaus, M., Vinzi, V. E., Chatelin, Y. M., & Lauro, C. (2005). PLS path modeling. Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, 48(1), 159–205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csda.2004.03.005
Testa, F., Pretner, G., Iovino, R., Bianchi, G., Tessitore, S., & Iraldo, F. (2021). Drivers to green consumption. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 23(4), 4826–4880. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-020-00844-5
UNEP. (2015). Sustainable consumption and production: A handbook for policymakers. https://www.unep.org
Wang, Z., Guo, D., & Wang, X. (2019). Factors affecting green consumption: A systematic review. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 145, 215–226. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.02.012
Wooliscroft, B., & Ko, E. (2023). Green consumer behavior: An overview. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 31(1), 75–90. https://doi.org/10.1080/10696679.2022.2085512